Subject Verb Agreement Questions Gmat

Get­ting the sub­ject to agree with the verb is per­haps the most impor­tant of all sen­tence cor­rec­tion tasks. This topic comes up so often that it is worth get­ting acquainted with its dif­fer­ent facets. The theme of the sen­tence is the plural word “hopes”. There­fore, the sin­gu­lar “toasted” would be false. To be more airy in GMAT sen­tence cor­rec­tions, we don‘t nec­es­sar­ily need to know all the exist­ing gram­mar rules. It can be much more pro­duc­tive to know a hand­ful of spe­cific gram­mat­i­cal rules that the GMAT uses fre­quently. In this way, we can use these spe­cific gram­mat­i­cal rules to imme­di­ately elim­i­nate two or three answers and trust that our ear is guid­ing us the rest of the way. If you‘re prepar­ing for the ver­bal sec­tion, try to under­stand why some answers are wrong (except for “it sounds weird”). If you can say, “Hey, this option is wrong because it‘s a mod­i­fier that swings” or “This one is wrong between the verb doesn‘t match the sub­ject,” then you‘ll likely have sim­i­lar ten­den­cies on future GMAT ques­tions and you‘ll be able to ask more ques­tions cor­rectly. The #2 divided: The three nouns, joined in par­al­lel by “and”, are a com­pos­ite sub­ject. This theme — Dos­to­evsky, Niet­zsche and Kierkegaard — requires a plural verbage “were con­sid­ered the founders”.

The choices with the sin­gu­lar ver­sion “was con­sid­ered a founder”, are false. Deci­sions (B) & © & E) make this mis­take. We can talk about “no stu­dent”, “a few stu­dents”, “most stu­dents”, “every stu­dent”, “every stu­dent” or “all stu­dents”. It is quite easy to find — those who have “stu­dents” are sin­gu­lar and those who have “stu­dents” are plural. It becomes more dif­fi­cult when a sen­tence or amend­ing clause inter­venes (“no stu­dent, not even .… ”, “every stu­dent, includ­ing…” ”), but of course, whether the nouns are sin­gu­lar or plural does not affect the verb — the verb must cor­re­spond in num­ber with the sub­ject and only the sub­ject. If two or more nouns are con­nected by the word “and”, then they are all part of the sub­ject, so of course the sub­ject is plural and adopts a plural verb. Be care­ful if the sub­ject P and Q are sep­a­rated — P [long change clause] and Q. The verb MUST cor­re­spond to part X of the sub­ject. The two amend­ing phrases here – “sup­port the wishes of the inhab­i­tants” and “which con­sists of five mem­bers of the orga­ni­za­tion” – mask the sub­ject and the verb and make it dif­fi­cult to iden­tify their disagreements. .

. .